Assignment: Rules Revisited

Go here.  Read your post.  Revisit your thoughts in a new post.  Tag it with the category L.12.1.

If you did not have an original post, write one.  I would link to the blogpost online somewhere that we were responding to, but it seems to have vanished.

3 Thoughts on “Assignment: Rules Revisited

  1. Thanks, Dale, for the invite. I have been composing some posts to the brethren in my head for the past few months. Always talk myself out of actually writing and loading, though. Suspicious of my motives. “Assignments” are always freeing. Good for bleaching out that ever spreading taint of corruption.

    And I will revise my guidelines. Thanks. The conceit in one of mine (yes, choose a definition…) need some clarifying.

  2. Ah, The Critic. I always say let the audience suspect your motives. Don’t do it for them. As a matter of fact, I’m pretty sure that’s what you say as well.

  3. You are correct, sir. Truth be told, it’s really about taking the time to compose the damn things! Why can’t watching constellations assemble in my muttering mindscape be enough! You know?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Post Navigation